Running ‘testthat.R’ [435s/481s]
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
  > library(testthat)
  > test_check("Cyclops")
  Loading required package: Cyclops
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, and rowId
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, and rowId
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId, time (descending), y and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId, time (descending), y and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Sparseness = 76.245 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, and rowId
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId, time (descending), y and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Sparseness = 75.76 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  Sparseness = 98.96 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  Sparseness = 99.012 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  Sparseness = 99.012 %
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId, time (descending), y and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Sparseness = 75.61 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  Sparseness = 75.68 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  Sparseness = 74.8 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  Sparseness = 76.3 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  Sparseness = 99.012 %
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId, time (descending), y and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Generating censoring weights
  Generating censoring weights
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId, time (descending), y and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId, time (descending), y and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Sparseness = 98.0118 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  Using cross-validation selector type byRow
  Performing 10-fold cross-validation [seed = 123] with data partitions of sizes 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
  Using 1 thread(s)
  Starting var = 0.1
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = -338.789
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = -330.284
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = -353.899
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = -335.646
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = -358.186
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = -366.435
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = -340.397
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = -387.029
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = -362.843
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = -351.901
  AvgPred = -352.541 with stdev = 16.2486
  Completed at 0.1
  Next point at 1 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.1 ] = -352.541(16.2486)
  
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = -339.744
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = -329.994
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = -356.202
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = -338.098
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = -359.965
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = -368.641
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = -342.054
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = -386.735
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = -363.158
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = -352.828
  AvgPred = -353.742 with stdev = 16.0812
  Completed at 1
  Next point at 0.01 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.1 ] = -352.541(16.2486)
  search[ 1 ] = -353.742(16.0812)
  
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = -339.147
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = -331.097
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = -352.587
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = -332.684
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = -356.782
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = -365.857
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = -338.627
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = -389.238
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = -363.072
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = -351.024
  AvgPred = -352.012 with stdev = 16.9691
  Completed at 0.01
  Next point at 0.001 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.01 ] = -352.012(16.9691)
  search[ 0.1 ] = -352.541(16.2486)
  search[ 1 ] = -353.742(16.0812)
  
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = -342.862
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = -333.556
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = -355.351
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = -338.618
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = -361.295
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = -372.714
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = -339.167
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = -394.1
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = -362.63
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = -354.934
  AvgPred = -355.523 with stdev = 17.5047
  Completed at 0.001
  Next point at 0.0507463 with value -351.946 and continue = 0
  search[ 0.001 ] = -355.523(17.5047)
  search[ 0.01 ] = -352.012(16.9691)
  search[ 0.1 ] = -352.541(16.2486)
  search[ 1 ] = -353.742(16.0812)
  
  
  Maximum predicted log likelihood (-351.946) estimated at:
  	0.0507463 (variance)
  	6.27788 (lambda)
  
  Fitting model at optimal hyperparameter
  Using prior: Laplace(6.27788) None 
  Using cross-validation selector type byRow
  Performing 10-fold cross-validation [seed = 1616063925] with data partitions of sizes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
  Using 1 thread(s)
  Starting var = 0.333333 (default)
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = 44.57
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = 106.597
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = 14.674
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = 20.3427
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = 33.625
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = 59.4894
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = 79.8291
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = 112.869
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = 24.9457
  Running at Laplace(2.44949) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.333333 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = 0
  AvgPred = 49.6942 with stdev = 36.9966
  Completed at 0.333333
  Next point at 3.33333 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.333333 ] = 49.6942(36.9966)
  
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = 44.6336
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = 106.149
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = 14.5878
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = 20.3443
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = 32.8915
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = 57.3441
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = 79.7694
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = 110.219
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = 24.7919
  Running at Laplace(0.774597) None  Grid-point #2 at 3.33333 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = 0
  AvgPred = 49.0731 with stdev = 36.4706
  Completed at 3.33333
  Next point at 0.0333333 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.333333 ] = 49.6942(36.9966)
  search[ 3.33333 ] = 49.0731(36.4706)
  
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = 43.169
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = 107.806
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = 15.7525
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = 20.3273
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = 34.0061
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = 60.6085
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = 79.6334
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = 118.443
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = 25.0614
  Running at Laplace(7.74597) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.0333333 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = 0
  AvgPred = 50.4807 with stdev = 38.0685
  Completed at 0.0333333
  Next point at 0.00333333 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.0333333 ] = 50.4807(38.0685)
  search[ 0.333333 ] = 49.6942(36.9966)
  search[ 3.33333 ] = 49.0731(36.4706)
  
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = 42.498
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = 106.001
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = 16.8111
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = 19.9614
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = 33.9945
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = 62.1884
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = 79.0526
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = 118.246
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = 25.4635
  Running at Laplace(24.4949) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.00333333 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = 0
  AvgPred = 50.4216 with stdev = 37.6865
  Completed at 0.00333333
  Next point at 0.00389642 with value 50.4732 and continue = 0
  search[ 0.00333333 ] = 50.4216(37.6865)
  search[ 0.0333333 ] = 50.4807(38.0685)
  search[ 0.333333 ] = 49.6942(36.9966)
  search[ 3.33333 ] = 49.0731(36.4706)
  
  
  Maximum predicted log likelihood (50.4732) estimated at:
  	0.00389642 (variance)
  	22.6559 (lambda)
  
  Fitting model at optimal hyperparameter
  Using prior: Laplace(22.6559) None 
  Sparseness = 80.112 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, and rowId
  Using cross-validation selector type byPid
  Performing 10-fold cross-validation [seed = 123] with data partitions of sizes 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
  Using 1 thread(s)
  Starting var = 0.1
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = -14196.3
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = -12619.9
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = -12955.3
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = -12553.9
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = -13387.2
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = -14249.3
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = -13192.9
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = -13634.9
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = -14436.5
  Running at Laplace(4.47214) None  Grid-point #1 at 0.1 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = -13476.5
  AvgPred = -13470.3 with stdev = 632.967
  Completed at 0.1
  Next point at 1 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.1 ] = -13470.3(632.967)
  
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = -14196.4
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = -12620
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = -12955.3
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = -12553.9
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = -13387.2
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = -14249.3
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = -13193
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = -13634.9
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = -14436.5
  Running at Laplace(1.41421) None  Grid-point #2 at 1 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = -13476.5
  AvgPred = -13470.3 with stdev = 632.976
  Completed at 1
  Next point at 0.01 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.1 ] = -13470.3(632.967)
  search[ 1 ] = -13470.3(632.976)
  
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = -14196.3
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = -12619.9
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = -12955.3
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = -12554.1
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = -13387.1
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = -14249.3
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = -13192.9
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = -13634.9
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = -14436.4
  Running at Laplace(14.1421) None  Grid-point #3 at 0.01 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = -13476.3
  AvgPred = -13470.2 with stdev = 632.946
  Completed at 0.01
  Next point at 0.001 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.01 ] = -13470.2(632.946)
  search[ 0.1 ] = -13470.3(632.967)
  search[ 1 ] = -13470.3(632.976)
  
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = -14196.2
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = -12619.7
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = -12955.2
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = -12554.4
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = -13386.8
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = -14249.3
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = -13192.6
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = -13635.1
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = -14436.4
  Running at Laplace(44.7214) None  Grid-point #4 at 0.001 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = -13475.8
  AvgPred = -13470.2 with stdev = 632.926
  Completed at 0.001
  Next point at 0.0001 with value 0 and continue = 1
  search[ 0.001 ] = -13470.2(632.926)
  search[ 0.01 ] = -13470.2(632.946)
  search[ 0.1 ] = -13470.3(632.967)
  search[ 1 ] = -13470.3(632.976)
  
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #1 Rep #1 pred log like = -14195.9
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #2 Rep #1 pred log like = -12619.7
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #3 Rep #1 pred log like = -12955
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #4 Rep #1 pred log like = -12555.1
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #5 Rep #1 pred log like = -13387
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #6 Rep #1 pred log like = -14249.8
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #7 Rep #1 pred log like = -13192.2
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #8 Rep #1 pred log like = -13636.1
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #9 Rep #1 pred log like = -14436.4
  Running at Laplace(141.421) None  Grid-point #5 at 0.0001 	Fold #10 Rep #1 pred log like = -13475.1
  AvgPred = -13470.2 with stdev = 632.933
  Completed at 0.0001
  Next point at 8.80482e-05 with value -13470.2 and continue = 0
  search[ 0.0001 ] = -13470.2(632.933)
  search[ 0.001 ] = -13470.2(632.926)
  search[ 0.01 ] = -13470.2(632.946)
  search[ 0.1 ] = -13470.3(632.967)
  search[ 1 ] = -13470.3(632.976)
  
  
  Maximum predicted log likelihood (-13470.2) estimated at:
  	8.80482e-05 (variance)
  	150.714 (lambda)
  
  Fitting model at optimal hyperparameter
  Using prior: Laplace(150.714) None 
  Sparseness = 80.112 %
  Sorting outcomes by stratumId, time (descending), y and rowId
  Sorting covariates by covariateId, stratumId, time (descending), y, and rowId
  Sparseness = 99.09 %
  Sorting covariates by covariateId and rowId
  ══ Skipped tests ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  ● Current not working (1)
  ● On CRAN (4)
  ● empty test (5)
  ● for debugging purposes; simulation takes too long (1)
  
  ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  ── Failure (test-survfit.R:27:5): Check very small Cox example with no ties, breslow baseline ──
  goldSurv$surv not equal to cyclopsSurv$surv.
  7/7 mismatches (average diff: 0.118)
  [1] 0.9423 - 0.8922 == 0.0500
  [2] 0.9423 - 0.8922 == 0.0500
  [3] 0.8785 - 0.7802 == 0.0983
  [4] 0.7811 - 0.6228 == 0.1583
  [5] 0.7811 - 0.6228 == 0.1583
  [6] 0.5840 - 0.3567 == 0.2273
  [7] 0.0964 - 0.0113 == 0.0851
  ── Failure (test-survfit.R:51:5): Check very small Cox example with time-ties, but no failure ties, breslow baseline ──
  goldSurv$surv not equal to cyclopsSurv$surv.
  4/4 mismatches (average diff: 0.0174)
  [1] 0.865 - 0.874 == -0.0086
  [2] 0.698 - 0.716 == -0.0174
  [3] 0.505 - 0.529 == -0.0242
  [4] 0.131 - 0.151 == -0.0196
  ── Failure (test-survfit.R:73:5): Check very small Cox example with failure ties, no risk-set contribution after tie, breslow baseline ──
  goldSurv$surv not equal to cyclopsSurv$surv.
  3/3 mismatches (average diff: 0.0615)
  [1] 0.679 - 0.621 == 0.0578
  [2] 0.524 - 0.451 == 0.0724
  [3] 0.156 - 0.102 == 0.0543
  ── Failure (test-survfit.R:96:5): Check very small Cox example with failure ties, with risk-set contribution after tie, breslow baseline ──
  goldSurv$surv not equal to cyclopsSurv$surv.
  4/4 mismatches (average diff: 0.0728)
  [1] 0.912 - 0.8799 == 0.0321
  [2] 0.718 - 0.6317 == 0.0867
  [3] 0.574 - 0.4626 == 0.1114
  [4] 0.105 - 0.0435 == 0.0611
  
  [ FAIL 4 | WARN 202 | SKIP 11 | PASS 255 ]
  Error: Test failures
  Execution halted