Running ‘testthat.R’ [53s/72s]
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
  > library(testthat)
  > library(psycho)
  > 
  > test_check("psycho")
  ── 1. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.glmerMod.R#9)  ────────────────────────
  'summary' is not an exported object from 'namespace:lmerTest'
  1: psycho::analyze(fit) at testthat/test-analyze.glmerMod.R:9
  2: analyze.glmerMod(fit)
  3: data.frame(lmerTest::summary(fit)$coefficients)
  4: lmerTest::summary
  5: getExportedValue(pkg, name)
  6: stop(gettextf("'%s' is not an exported object from 'namespace:%s'", name, getNamespaceName(ns)), 
         call. = FALSE, domain = NA)
  
  ── 2. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merMod.R#9)  ──────────────────────────
  object of type 'closure' is not subsettable
  1: psycho::analyze(x) at testthat/test-analyze.merMod.R:9
  2: analyze.merMod(x)
  3: analyze(fit)
  4: analyze.merMod(fit)
  5: lmerTest::lmer(formula, data)
  6: eval.parent(mc)
  7: eval(expr, p)
  8: eval(expr, p)
  9: lme4::lmer(formula = formula, data = data)
  10: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  11: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  12: lme4::lFormula(formula = formula, data = data, control = structure(list(optimizer = "bobyqa", 
         restart_edge = TRUE, boundary.tol = 1e-05, calc.derivs = TRUE, use.last.params = FALSE, 
         checkControl = list(check.nobs.vs.rankZ = "ignore", check.nobs.vs.nlev = "stop", 
             check.nlev.gtreq.5 = "ignore", check.nlev.gtr.1 = "stop", check.nobs.vs.nRE = "stop", 
             check.rankX = "message+drop.cols", check.scaleX = "warning", check.formula.LHS = "stop"), 
         checkConv = list(check.conv.grad = list(action = "warning", tol = 0.002, relTol = NULL), 
             check.conv.singular = list(action = "ignore", tol = 1e-04), check.conv.hess = list(
                 action = "warning", tol = 1e-06)), optCtrl = list()), class = c("lmerControl", 
     "merControl")))
  13: checkFormulaData(formula, data, checkLHS = control$check.formula.LHS == "stop")
  14: stopifnot(!checkLHS || length(as.formula(formula, env = denv)) == 3)
  15: withCallingHandlers(tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), 
         error = function(e) {
             e$call <- cl.i
             stop(e)
         }), warning = function(w) {
         w$call <- cl.i
         w
     })
  16: tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), error = function(e) {
         e$call <- cl.i
         stop(e)
     })
  17: tryCatchList(expr, classes, parentenv, handlers)
  18: tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1L]])
  19: value[[3L]](cond)
  
  ── 3. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R#9)  ──────────────────
  object of type 'closure' is not subsettable
  1: psycho::analyze(fit) at testthat/test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R:9
  2: analyze.merMod(fit)
  3: analyze(fit)
  4: analyze.merMod(fit)
  5: lmerTest::lmer(formula, data)
  6: eval.parent(mc)
  7: eval(expr, p)
  8: eval(expr, p)
  9: lme4::lmer(formula = formula, data = data)
  10: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  11: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  12: lme4::lFormula(formula = formula, data = data, control = structure(list(optimizer = "bobyqa", 
         restart_edge = TRUE, boundary.tol = 1e-05, calc.derivs = TRUE, use.last.params = FALSE, 
         checkControl = list(check.nobs.vs.rankZ = "ignore", check.nobs.vs.nlev = "stop", 
             check.nlev.gtreq.5 = "ignore", check.nlev.gtr.1 = "stop", check.nobs.vs.nRE = "stop", 
             check.rankX = "message+drop.cols", check.scaleX = "warning", check.formula.LHS = "stop"), 
         checkConv = list(check.conv.grad = list(action = "warning", tol = 0.002, relTol = NULL), 
             check.conv.singular = list(action = "ignore", tol = 1e-04), check.conv.hess = list(
                 action = "warning", tol = 1e-06)), optCtrl = list()), class = c("lmerControl", 
     "merControl")))
  13: checkFormulaData(formula, data, checkLHS = control$check.formula.LHS == "stop")
  14: stopifnot(!checkLHS || length(as.formula(formula, env = denv)) == 3)
  15: withCallingHandlers(tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), 
         error = function(e) {
             e$call <- cl.i
             stop(e)
         }), warning = function(w) {
         w$call <- cl.i
         w
     })
  16: tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), error = function(e) {
         e$call <- cl.i
         stop(e)
     })
  17: tryCatchList(expr, classes, parentenv, handlers)
  18: tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1L]])
  19: value[[3L]](cond)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4.8e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.48 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.648305 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.553883 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.20219 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.9e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.29 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.645054 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.461647 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.1067 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4.1e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.41 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.644473 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.448323 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.0928 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.5e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.25 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.638707 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.479669 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.11838 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 0.000198 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 1.98 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.71227 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.9821 seconds (Sampling)
                 7.69437 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.9e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.39 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.92188 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.5309 seconds (Sampling)
                 7.45278 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 7.4e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.74 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.74335 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.62106 seconds (Sampling)
                 7.36441 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.5 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 4.31652 seconds (Warm-up)
                 2.66353 seconds (Sampling)
                 6.98006 seconds (Total)
  
  The Crawford-Howell (1998) t-test suggests that the case partipant is significantly distinct from the control group (t(7) = 3.05, p < .05*).
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.46 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.12964 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.144367 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.274007 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.5e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.35 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.136453 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.155324 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.291777 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.26 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.127089 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.117736 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.244825 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.26 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.119125 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.109986 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.229111 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4.4e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.44 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.116027 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.107598 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.223625 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.2 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.106612 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.104688 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.2113 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.3 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.112929 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.101181 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.21411 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.4e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.24 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.134328 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.109601 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.243929 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.8e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.58 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.296961 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.288811 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.585772 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.33 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.310841 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.323082 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.633923 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.53 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.31167 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.282796 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.594466 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4.4e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.44 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.277352 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.288699 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.566051 seconds (Total)
  
  The Mellenbergh & van den Brink (1998) test suggests that the change is not significant (d = 8, 90% CI [1.06, 14.94], z = 1.90, p = 0.06<b0>).
  
  The Mellenbergh & van den Brink (1998) test suggests that the change is significant (d = 8, 90% CI [2.07, 13.93], z = 2.23, p < .05*).
  
  1
  ══ testthat results  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  OK: 56 SKIPPED: 0 FAILED: 3
  1. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.glmerMod.R#9) 
  2. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merMod.R#9) 
  3. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R#9) 
  
  Error: testthat unit tests failed
  Execution halted