Running ‘testthat.R’ [51s/51s]
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
  > library(testthat)
  > library(psycho)
  > 
  > test_check("psycho")
  ── 1. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.glmerMod.R#9)  ────────────────────────
  'summary' is not an exported object from 'namespace:lmerTest'
  1: psycho::analyze(fit) at testthat/test-analyze.glmerMod.R:9
  2: analyze.glmerMod(fit)
  3: data.frame(lmerTest::summary(fit)$coefficients)
  4: lmerTest::summary
  5: getExportedValue(pkg, name)
  6: stop(gettextf("'%s' is not an exported object from 'namespace:%s'", name, getNamespaceName(ns)), 
         call. = FALSE, domain = NA)
  
  ── 2. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merMod.R#9)  ──────────────────────────
  object of type 'closure' is not subsettable
  1: psycho::analyze(x) at testthat/test-analyze.merMod.R:9
  2: analyze.merMod(x)
  3: analyze(fit)
  4: analyze.merMod(fit)
  5: lmerTest::lmer(formula, data)
  6: eval.parent(mc)
  7: eval(expr, p)
  8: eval(expr, p)
  9: lme4::lmer(formula = formula, data = data)
  10: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  11: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  12: lme4::lFormula(formula = formula, data = data, control = structure(list(optimizer = "bobyqa", 
         restart_edge = TRUE, boundary.tol = 1e-05, calc.derivs = TRUE, use.last.params = FALSE, 
         checkControl = list(check.nobs.vs.rankZ = "ignore", check.nobs.vs.nlev = "stop", 
             check.nlev.gtreq.5 = "ignore", check.nlev.gtr.1 = "stop", check.nobs.vs.nRE = "stop", 
             check.rankX = "message+drop.cols", check.scaleX = "warning", check.formula.LHS = "stop"), 
         checkConv = list(check.conv.grad = list(action = "warning", tol = 0.002, relTol = NULL), 
             check.conv.singular = list(action = "ignore", tol = 1e-04), check.conv.hess = list(
                 action = "warning", tol = 1e-06)), optCtrl = list()), class = c("lmerControl", 
     "merControl")))
  13: checkFormulaData(formula, data, checkLHS = control$check.formula.LHS == "stop")
  14: stopifnot(!checkLHS || length(as.formula(formula, env = denv)) == 3)
  15: withCallingHandlers(tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), 
         error = function(e) {
             e$call <- cl.i
             stop(e)
         }), warning = function(w) {
         w$call <- cl.i
         w
     })
  16: tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), error = function(e) {
         e$call <- cl.i
         stop(e)
     })
  17: tryCatchList(expr, classes, parentenv, handlers)
  18: tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1L]])
  19: value[[3L]](cond)
  
  ── 3. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R#9)  ──────────────────
  object of type 'closure' is not subsettable
  1: psycho::analyze(fit) at testthat/test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R:9
  2: analyze.merMod(fit)
  3: analyze(fit)
  4: analyze.merMod(fit)
  5: lmerTest::lmer(formula, data)
  6: eval.parent(mc)
  7: eval(expr, p)
  8: eval(expr, p)
  9: lme4::lmer(formula = formula, data = data)
  10: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  11: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  12: lme4::lFormula(formula = formula, data = data, control = structure(list(optimizer = "bobyqa", 
         restart_edge = TRUE, boundary.tol = 1e-05, calc.derivs = TRUE, use.last.params = FALSE, 
         checkControl = list(check.nobs.vs.rankZ = "ignore", check.nobs.vs.nlev = "stop", 
             check.nlev.gtreq.5 = "ignore", check.nlev.gtr.1 = "stop", check.nobs.vs.nRE = "stop", 
             check.rankX = "message+drop.cols", check.scaleX = "warning", check.formula.LHS = "stop"), 
         checkConv = list(check.conv.grad = list(action = "warning", tol = 0.002, relTol = NULL), 
             check.conv.singular = list(action = "ignore", tol = 1e-04), check.conv.hess = list(
                 action = "warning", tol = 1e-06)), optCtrl = list()), class = c("lmerControl", 
     "merControl")))
  13: checkFormulaData(formula, data, checkLHS = control$check.formula.LHS == "stop")
  14: stopifnot(!checkLHS || length(as.formula(formula, env = denv)) == 3)
  15: withCallingHandlers(tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), 
         error = function(e) {
             e$call <- cl.i
             stop(e)
         }), warning = function(w) {
         w$call <- cl.i
         w
     })
  16: tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), error = function(e) {
         e$call <- cl.i
         stop(e)
     })
  17: tryCatchList(expr, classes, parentenv, handlers)
  18: tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1L]])
  19: value[[3L]](cond)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  
  Gradient evaluation took 0.000211 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 2.11 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.706618 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.541693 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.24831 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.1e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.31 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.572222 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.56674 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.13896 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.26 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.65925 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.512038 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.17129 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.8e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.28 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.696946 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.534604 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.23155 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 0.000111 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 1.11 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.25751 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.08655 seconds (Sampling)
                 6.34405 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.8e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.28 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.88887 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.96412 seconds (Sampling)
                 7.85299 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4.3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.43 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.94561 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.2926 seconds (Sampling)
                 7.23821 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.5 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.86375 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.01151 seconds (Sampling)
                 6.87526 seconds (Total)
  
  The Crawford-Howell (1998) t-test suggests that the case partipant is significantly distinct from the control group (t(7) = 3.05, p < .05*).
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.56 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.156226 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.166511 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.322737 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.9e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.29 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.152958 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.181005 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.333963 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.3 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.151268 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.146422 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.29769 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.5e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.25 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.141896 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.142637 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.284533 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.56 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.064475 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.070621 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.135096 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.26 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.106043 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.095037 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.20108 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.26 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.071252 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.068578 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.13983 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 1.4e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.14 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.078926 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.107038 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.185964 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 7.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.76 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.312548 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.313986 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.626534 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.7e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.37 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.302332 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.202608 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.50494 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.2e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.22 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.265418 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.243919 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.509337 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.5e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.25 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.175099 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.234978 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.410077 seconds (Total)
  
  The Mellenbergh & van den Brink (1998) test suggests that the change is not significant (d = 8, 90% CI [1.06, 14.94], z = 1.90, p = 0.06<b0>).
  
  The Mellenbergh & van den Brink (1998) test suggests that the change is significant (d = 8, 90% CI [2.07, 13.93], z = 2.23, p < .05*).
  
  1
  ══ testthat results  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  OK: 56 SKIPPED: 0 FAILED: 3
  1. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.glmerMod.R#9) 
  2. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merMod.R#9) 
  3. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R#9) 
  
  Error: testthat unit tests failed
  Execution halted