Running ‘testthat.R’ [59s/81s]
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
  > library(testthat)
  > library(psycho)
  > 
  > test_check("psycho")
  ── 1. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.glmerMod.R#9)  ────────────────────────
  'summary' is not an exported object from 'namespace:lmerTest'
  1: psycho::analyze(fit) at testthat/test-analyze.glmerMod.R:9
  2: analyze.glmerMod(fit)
  3: data.frame(lmerTest::summary(fit)$coefficients)
  4: lmerTest::summary
  5: getExportedValue(pkg, name)
  6: stop(gettextf("'%s' is not an exported object from 'namespace:%s'", name, getNamespaceName(ns)), 
         call. = FALSE, domain = NA)
  
  ── 2. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merMod.R#9)  ──────────────────────────
  object of type 'closure' is not subsettable
  1: psycho::analyze(x) at testthat/test-analyze.merMod.R:9
  2: analyze.merMod(x)
  3: analyze(fit)
  4: analyze.merMod(fit)
  5: lmerTest::lmer(formula, data)
  6: eval.parent(mc)
  7: eval(expr, p)
  8: eval(expr, p)
  9: lme4::lmer(formula = formula, data = data)
  10: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  11: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  12: lme4::lFormula(formula = formula, data = data, control = structure(list(optimizer = "bobyqa", 
         restart_edge = TRUE, boundary.tol = 1e-05, calc.derivs = TRUE, use.last.params = FALSE, 
         checkControl = list(check.nobs.vs.rankZ = "ignore", check.nobs.vs.nlev = "stop", 
             check.nlev.gtreq.5 = "ignore", check.nlev.gtr.1 = "stop", check.nobs.vs.nRE = "stop", 
             check.rankX = "message+drop.cols", check.scaleX = "warning", check.formula.LHS = "stop"), 
         checkConv = list(check.conv.grad = list(action = "warning", tol = 0.002, relTol = NULL), 
             check.conv.singular = list(action = "ignore", tol = 1e-04), check.conv.hess = list(
                 action = "warning", tol = 1e-06)), optCtrl = list()), class = c("lmerControl", 
     "merControl")))
  13: checkFormulaData(formula, data, checkLHS = control$check.formula.LHS == "stop")
  14: stopifnot(!checkLHS || length(as.formula(formula, env = denv)) == 3)
  15: withCallingHandlers(tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), 
         error = function(e) {
             e$call <- cl.i
             stop(e)
         }), warning = function(w) {
         w$call <- cl.i
         w
     })
  16: tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), error = function(e) {
         e$call <- cl.i
         stop(e)
     })
  17: tryCatchList(expr, classes, parentenv, handlers)
  18: tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1L]])
  19: value[[3L]](cond)
  
  ── 3. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R#9)  ──────────────────
  object of type 'closure' is not subsettable
  1: psycho::analyze(fit) at testthat/test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R:9
  2: analyze.merMod(fit)
  3: analyze(fit)
  4: analyze.merMod(fit)
  5: lmerTest::lmer(formula, data)
  6: eval.parent(mc)
  7: eval(expr, p)
  8: eval(expr, p)
  9: lme4::lmer(formula = formula, data = data)
  10: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  11: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  12: lme4::lFormula(formula = formula, data = data, control = structure(list(optimizer = "bobyqa", 
         restart_edge = TRUE, boundary.tol = 1e-05, calc.derivs = TRUE, use.last.params = FALSE, 
         checkControl = list(check.nobs.vs.rankZ = "ignore", check.nobs.vs.nlev = "stop", 
             check.nlev.gtreq.5 = "ignore", check.nlev.gtr.1 = "stop", check.nobs.vs.nRE = "stop", 
             check.rankX = "message+drop.cols", check.scaleX = "warning", check.formula.LHS = "stop"), 
         checkConv = list(check.conv.grad = list(action = "warning", tol = 0.002, relTol = NULL), 
             check.conv.singular = list(action = "ignore", tol = 1e-04), check.conv.hess = list(
                 action = "warning", tol = 1e-06)), optCtrl = list()), class = c("lmerControl", 
     "merControl")))
  13: checkFormulaData(formula, data, checkLHS = control$check.formula.LHS == "stop")
  14: stopifnot(!checkLHS || length(as.formula(formula, env = denv)) == 3)
  15: withCallingHandlers(tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), 
         error = function(e) {
             e$call <- cl.i
             stop(e)
         }), warning = function(w) {
         w$call <- cl.i
         w
     })
  16: tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), error = function(e) {
         e$call <- cl.i
         stop(e)
     })
  17: tryCatchList(expr, classes, parentenv, handlers)
  18: tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1L]])
  19: value[[3L]](cond)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  
  Gradient evaluation took 0.00225 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 22.5 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.700085 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.647774 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.34786 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.7e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.37 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.767204 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.512236 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.27944 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.1e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.31 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.757485 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.51715 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.27463 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.33 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.757954 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.578205 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.33616 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 0.000102 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 1.02 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 4.31728 seconds (Warm-up)
                 4.4626 seconds (Sampling)
                 8.77988 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 6.8e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.68 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 4.54044 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.99096 seconds (Sampling)
                 8.53139 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.6e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.56 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 4.12066 seconds (Warm-up)
                 4.0041 seconds (Sampling)
                 8.12476 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.5 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 4.55796 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.0632 seconds (Sampling)
                 7.62117 seconds (Total)
  
  The Crawford-Howell (1998) t-test suggests that the case partipant is significantly distinct from the control group (t(7) = 3.05, p < .05*).
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.53 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.16114 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.164756 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.325896 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.3 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.143322 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.181564 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.324886 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.9e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.29 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.145624 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.140698 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.286322 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.5e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.55 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.138224 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.132871 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.271095 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4.8e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.48 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.114294 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.106384 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.220678 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.5e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.25 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.117176 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.102657 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.219833 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.23 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.104358 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.102125 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.206483 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.1e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.21 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.129761 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.114748 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.244509 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 6.8e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.68 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.327131 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.310776 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.637907 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4.2e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.42 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.33393 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.323517 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.657447 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.2e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.52 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.308664 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.292784 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.601448 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.9e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.39 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.295075 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.303564 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.598639 seconds (Total)
  
  The Mellenbergh & van den Brink (1998) test suggests that the change is not significant (d = 8, 90% CI [1.06, 14.94], z = 1.90, p = 0.06<b0>).
  
  The Mellenbergh & van den Brink (1998) test suggests that the change is significant (d = 8, 90% CI [2.07, 13.93], z = 2.23, p < .05*).
  
  1
  ══ testthat results  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  OK: 56 SKIPPED: 0 FAILED: 3
  1. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.glmerMod.R#9) 
  2. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merMod.R#9) 
  3. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R#9) 
  
  Error: testthat unit tests failed
  Execution halted