Running ‘testthat.R’ [49s/50s]
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
  > library(testthat)
  > library(psycho)
  > 
  > test_check("psycho")
  ── 1. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.glmerMod.R#9)  ────────────────────────
  'summary' is not an exported object from 'namespace:lmerTest'
  1: psycho::analyze(fit) at testthat/test-analyze.glmerMod.R:9
  2: analyze.glmerMod(fit)
  3: data.frame(lmerTest::summary(fit)$coefficients)
  4: lmerTest::summary
  5: getExportedValue(pkg, name)
  6: stop(gettextf("'%s' is not an exported object from 'namespace:%s'", name, getNamespaceName(ns)), 
         call. = FALSE, domain = NA)
  
  ── 2. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merMod.R#9)  ──────────────────────────
  object of type 'closure' is not subsettable
  1: psycho::analyze(x) at testthat/test-analyze.merMod.R:9
  2: analyze.merMod(x)
  3: analyze(fit)
  4: analyze.merMod(fit)
  5: lmerTest::lmer(formula, data)
  6: eval.parent(mc)
  7: eval(expr, p)
  8: eval(expr, p)
  9: lme4::lmer(formula = formula, data = data)
  10: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  11: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  12: lme4::lFormula(formula = formula, data = data, control = structure(list(optimizer = "bobyqa", 
         restart_edge = TRUE, boundary.tol = 1e-05, calc.derivs = TRUE, use.last.params = FALSE, 
         checkControl = list(check.nobs.vs.rankZ = "ignore", check.nobs.vs.nlev = "stop", 
             check.nlev.gtreq.5 = "ignore", check.nlev.gtr.1 = "stop", check.nobs.vs.nRE = "stop", 
             check.rankX = "message+drop.cols", check.scaleX = "warning", check.formula.LHS = "stop"), 
         checkConv = list(check.conv.grad = list(action = "warning", tol = 0.002, relTol = NULL), 
             check.conv.singular = list(action = "ignore", tol = 1e-04), check.conv.hess = list(
                 action = "warning", tol = 1e-06)), optCtrl = list()), class = c("lmerControl", 
     "merControl")))
  13: checkFormulaData(formula, data, checkLHS = control$check.formula.LHS == "stop")
  14: stopifnot(!checkLHS || length(as.formula(formula, env = denv)) == 3)
  15: withCallingHandlers(tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), 
         error = function(e) {
             e$call <- cl.i
             stop(e)
         }), warning = function(w) {
         w$call <- cl.i
         w
     })
  16: tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), error = function(e) {
         e$call <- cl.i
         stop(e)
     })
  17: tryCatchList(expr, classes, parentenv, handlers)
  18: tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1L]])
  19: value[[3L]](cond)
  
  ── 3. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R#9)  ──────────────────
  object of type 'closure' is not subsettable
  1: psycho::analyze(fit) at testthat/test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R:9
  2: analyze.merMod(fit)
  3: analyze(fit)
  4: analyze.merMod(fit)
  5: lmerTest::lmer(formula, data)
  6: eval.parent(mc)
  7: eval(expr, p)
  8: eval(expr, p)
  9: lme4::lmer(formula = formula, data = data)
  10: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  11: eval(mc, parent.frame(1L))
  12: lme4::lFormula(formula = formula, data = data, control = structure(list(optimizer = "bobyqa", 
         restart_edge = TRUE, boundary.tol = 1e-05, calc.derivs = TRUE, use.last.params = FALSE, 
         checkControl = list(check.nobs.vs.rankZ = "ignore", check.nobs.vs.nlev = "stop", 
             check.nlev.gtreq.5 = "ignore", check.nlev.gtr.1 = "stop", check.nobs.vs.nRE = "stop", 
             check.rankX = "message+drop.cols", check.scaleX = "warning", check.formula.LHS = "stop"), 
         checkConv = list(check.conv.grad = list(action = "warning", tol = 0.002, relTol = NULL), 
             check.conv.singular = list(action = "ignore", tol = 1e-04), check.conv.hess = list(
                 action = "warning", tol = 1e-06)), optCtrl = list()), class = c("lmerControl", 
     "merControl")))
  13: checkFormulaData(formula, data, checkLHS = control$check.formula.LHS == "stop")
  14: stopifnot(!checkLHS || length(as.formula(formula, env = denv)) == 3)
  15: withCallingHandlers(tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), 
         error = function(e) {
             e$call <- cl.i
             stop(e)
         }), warning = function(w) {
         w$call <- cl.i
         w
     })
  16: tryCatch(if (missE) ...elt(i) else eval(cl.i, envir = envir), error = function(e) {
         e$call <- cl.i
         stop(e)
     })
  17: tryCatchList(expr, classes, parentenv, handlers)
  18: tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1L]])
  19: value[[3L]](cond)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  
  Gradient evaluation took 0.000255 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 2.55 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.677217 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.599132 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.27635 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  Rejecting initial value:
    Log probability evaluates to log(0), i.e. negative infinity.
    Stan can't start sampling from this initial value.
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.2e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.32 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.785603 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.536925 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.32253 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.3 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.59974 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.427589 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.02733 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 1.7e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.17 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.591046 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.431106 seconds (Sampling)
                 1.02215 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 0.000132 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 1.32 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.6956 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.26144 seconds (Sampling)
                 6.95704 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.4 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.45878 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.60506 seconds (Sampling)
                 7.06384 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.1e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.31 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 3.63808 seconds (Warm-up)
                 3.38094 seconds (Sampling)
                 7.01902 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 4.4e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.44 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 4.15366 seconds (Warm-up)
                 2.07714 seconds (Sampling)
                 6.23081 seconds (Total)
  
  The Crawford-Howell (1998) t-test suggests that the case partipant is significantly distinct from the control group (t(7) = 3.05, p < .05*).
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.9e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.59 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.151736 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.154801 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.306537 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.2e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.32 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.154664 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.177395 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.332059 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.3 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.136364 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.119563 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.255927 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'bernoulli' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.7e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.27 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.135175 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.135152 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.270327 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 5.9e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.59 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.074391 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.112832 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.187223 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.8e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.28 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.091586 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.062336 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.153922 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 1.8e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.18 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.061942 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.069068 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.13101 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 1.7e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.17 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.077699 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.068601 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.1463 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 7.1e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.71 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.261637 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.230069 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.491706 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 2.7e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.27 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.263925 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.186787 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.450712 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.3 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.185203 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.175579 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.360782 seconds (Total)
  
  
  SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
  
  Gradient evaluation took 3.3e-05 seconds
  1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.33 seconds.
  Adjust your expectations accordingly!
  
  
  Iteration:    1 / 2000 [  0%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  200 / 2000 [ 10%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  400 / 2000 [ 20%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  600 / 2000 [ 30%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration:  800 / 2000 [ 40%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1000 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Warmup)
  Iteration: 1001 / 2000 [ 50%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1200 / 2000 [ 60%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1400 / 2000 [ 70%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1600 / 2000 [ 80%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%]  (Sampling)
  Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%]  (Sampling)
  
   Elapsed Time: 0.246075 seconds (Warm-up)
                 0.287815 seconds (Sampling)
                 0.53389 seconds (Total)
  
  The Mellenbergh & van den Brink (1998) test suggests that the change is not significant (d = 8, 90% CI [1.06, 14.94], z = 1.90, p = 0.06<b0>).
  
  The Mellenbergh & van den Brink (1998) test suggests that the change is significant (d = 8, 90% CI [2.07, 13.93], z = 2.23, p < .05*).
  
  1
  ══ testthat results  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  OK: 56 SKIPPED: 0 FAILED: 3
  1. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.glmerMod.R#9) 
  2. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merMod.R#9) 
  3. Error: If it works. (@test-analyze.merModLmerTest.R#9) 
  
  Error: testthat unit tests failed
  Execution halted